For several items in the bylaws, for example during elections, alumni Brothers still should still have full participation rights despite not being an undergrad.
For several items in the bylaws, for example during elections, alumni Brothers still should still have full participation rights despite not being an undergrad.
This is something we can discuss at an upcoming bylaw review, however I find this change extremely unlikely to find a great deal of support. As graduate brothers do not generally live on housing, do not attend events that are mandatory to undergraduates, and do not have the responsiblilities of undergraduate brothers. As such, it seems incorrect to give them a vote on electing officers that primarily influence these matters. It should be noted, that graduate Brothers are always welcome at Chapter Council, and can give advice and wisdom on the candidates.
This is something we can discuss at an upcoming bylaw review, however I find this change extremely unlikely to find a great deal of support. As graduate brothers do not generally live on housing, do not attend events that are mandatory to undergraduates, and do not have the responsiblilities of undergraduate brothers. As such, it seems incorrect to give them a vote on electing officers that primarily influence these matters. It should be noted, that graduate Brothers are always welcome at Chapter Council, and can give advice and wisdom on the candidates.
1114
added this to the (deleted) project 2021-11-03 20:36:43 +00:00
What about graduate brothers that remain on housing
Not a common occurrence
No good way to decide if a grad participates enough
Grads have rights limited in very specific ways
Bylaw Review:
- What about graduate brothers that remain on housing
- Not a common occurrence
- No good way to decide if a grad participates enough
- Grads have rights limited in very specific ways
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
For several items in the bylaws, for example during elections, alumni Brothers still should still have full participation rights despite not being an undergrad.
This is something we can discuss at an upcoming bylaw review, however I find this change extremely unlikely to find a great deal of support. As graduate brothers do not generally live on housing, do not attend events that are mandatory to undergraduates, and do not have the responsiblilities of undergraduate brothers. As such, it seems incorrect to give them a vote on electing officers that primarily influence these matters. It should be noted, that graduate Brothers are always welcome at Chapter Council, and can give advice and wisdom on the candidates.
Bylaw Review: